Significantly, the year of 2020 marked the beginning of the legal journey of the case that the Supreme Court of India had decided to hear on Wednesday, it remained the PIL (public interest litigation) filed by Delhi’s Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal against the federal government. This will have a great effect now that the upcoming election is fast approaching as Kejriwal is facing several legal complications. Featuring this case at a high level and the grave failure Sunita Kejriwal (his wife) faced to gain permission to see her husband at jail, created a further media and public interest.
Table of Contents
Background of the Case
Arvind Kejriwal, an eminent political leader and the head of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), along with his stint as the Chief Minister of Delhi, is now involved in legal rattles, which he was privy to in the recent times. The particulars of the allegations or the instances that might have caused his arrest have not been made public by his lawyers in full-fledged detail yet, but they have definitely generated a lot of buzz as well as media outrage.
Supreme Court hearing deliberates.
The Supreme Court’s decision to hear Kejriwal’s appeal signifies the case’s crucial role and the eventual impact it might have on the country’s politics and the running of government. Legal equates the judicial process with issues starting from the issue of justice to the larger question on the criteria for holding the person responsible or not for failure of duty.
Denial of Visitation Rights
The removal of permission for Sunita Kejriwal to meet her spouse in jail has humanized the legal process by attaching a family, personal and emotional dimension. The supporters who are for Kejriwal and civil liberties–minded people have come forward with the criticism of such a decision as it is against basic human rights and also the right for a person who is detained. The reasons behind refusal of visitors rights have not been adequately stated by the concerned authorities, causing rumors and numerous reckling of questions on the matter.
Potential Outcomes
These can be different various outcomes of a today’s hearing which may come out as a possible legal decision upon Kejriwal’s immediate status, such as bail or detention. On top of this, it has to be the manner how the related issues dealing with visitation rights are approached may form the model for functionality of the existing similar cases.
Public and Political Repercussions
The case in political sense of the matter, as Arvind Kejriwal is more of a political figure as opposed to a celebrity. The result of this trial will no doubt affect his political future and even the inter-system dynamics in Indian politics, with the ties between the judiciary and elected officials being another possible area of influence.
Conclusion
With the Supreme Court about to hear the request of Arvind Kejriwal case, the public attention now focused on the possible effects, legal and political, of this case. The denial of her conjugal rights during proceedings would help realize the poignant part of the case, raising questions about civil liberty and/or judicial intervention in India. The matter not only showed up the important aspects of governance and law but also revealed the problems within the system. There are challenges of Indian judicial and political systems.
